- Topic1/3
10k Popularity
60k Popularity
13k Popularity
20k Popularity
2k Popularity
- Pin
- #Gate 2025 Semi-Year Community Gala# voting is in progress! 🔥
Gate Square TOP 40 Creator Leaderboard is out
🙌 Vote to support your favorite creators: www.gate.com/activities/community-vote
Earn Votes by completing daily [Square] tasks. 30 delivered Votes = 1 lucky draw chance!
🎁 Win prizes like iPhone 16 Pro Max, Golden Bull Sculpture, Futures Voucher, and hot tokens.
The more you support, the higher your chances!
Vote to support creators now and win big!
https://www.gate.com/announcements/article/45974
- 🎉 Hey Gate Square friends! Non-stop perks and endless excitement—our hottest posting reward events are ongoing now! The more you post, the more you win. Don’t miss your exclusive goodies! 🚀
1️⃣ #ETH Hits 4800# | Market Analysis & Prediction: Boldly share your ETH predictions to showcase your insights! 10 lucky users will split a 0.1 ETH prize!
Details 👉 https://www.gate.com/post/status/12322612
2️⃣ #Creator Campaign Phase 2# |ZKWASM Topic: Share original content about ZKWASM or its trading activity on X or Gate Square to win a share of 4,000 ZKWASM!
Details 👉 https://www.gate.com/post/st
Ethereum introduced programmable settlement/smart contracts that lead to the rise of dapps, NFTs, DeFi etc
But @anoma is going a step further by making it’s settlement layer itself fully scriptable
not bound to any token or account
Instead of sending transactions to a smart contract.
Users submit intent
“I intend to A,B,C,D,E,F,G,H….”
The protocol matches compatible intents and create a transaction for settlement
While On ethereum users have to find and call the right contracts themselves
Do you think Anoma is more efficient?