Recently, Anatoly Yakovenko, the co-founder of Solana, sparked a discussion about the value of encryption assets in a conversation with Coinbase's Jesse Pollak. Yakovenko referred to Meme coins and NFTs as "digital trash," a statement that immediately stirred widespread controversy in the encryption community.

Many people believe that while Meme coins and NFTs may lack practicality, dismissing them entirely as "digital garbage" seems overly dogmatic. This statement overlooks the potential value of these digital assets in cultural, artistic, and social aspects.

Especially in the gaming sector, NFTs and blockchain-based games (GameFi) have shown certain application prospects. Although this field is still in its early stages, completely denying its value may be biased.

Yakovenko's remarks have also sparked thoughts on the nature of the value of encryption assets. What exactly defines the value of a digital asset? Is it its utility, scarcity, or community consensus?

This discussion highlights the differences in the understanding of the value of different types of digital assets within the encryption currency industry. As the industry continues to evolve, we may need to reassess and redefine the value standards of digital assets.